How should we ensure that the television is a positive influence in the life of children?
It is true that Television is a great modern technology for entertainment and education. However, there are certain drawbacks that could be detrimental to children if people are not careful with the effect of it. Thus, there are several measures that should be implemented to retain the merit of TV.
First and foremost, parents should supervise their children while they are enjoying the shows. The adult might have a better understanding about whether the programs are appropriate for kids or not. This method would reduce the probability of being exposed to violent or adult channels, which could cause pernicious effect on children’s mind. In addition, setting a watching limit time is another great solution. Binge watch might not only impair the eye sight but also the mentality. For example, children might not distinguish real life and fiction, leading to hazard action like jumping out the windows. However, it is not easy for parent to control their children all the time since there are lots of works to do.
The joint effort of the government is also required. The frequency of adult programs and channels on TV, especially at prime hours from 7 pm to 9 pm, should be curtailed to ensure the positive impact of TV. Because most families enjoy the television together after dinner, thus at this time the authorities should only allow family-friendly shows to live on TV. Beside the programs, advertisement could also have a negative effect on children. Thus, those ads that provide fault information or encourage consuming fast food should be as well limited to ensure the well-being of children. A drawback of this solution is that it could be affect the developing of other programs due to drop in audience.
In conclusion, although protecting kids from negative influences of television is a hard task, it is possible if the government and individuals work in unison.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-03 | heyrawrr | 71 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | lilyaa2910 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-18 | namviet | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-26 | Ngoc Trinh | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | akorn99 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show how selected age groups bought concert cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2013 in three countries and how the Internet was accessed 69
- How should we ensure that the television is a positive influence in the life of children 78
- the graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of people in the United Kingdom per age group without any qualifications 60
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
.... Binge watch might not only impair the eye sight but also the mentality. For example, ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09324758842 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80804799254 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585209003215 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1429549073 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1764705882 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214325244691 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557305980269 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428464420376 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116348106117 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267883698597 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
.... Binge watch might not only impair the eye sight but also the mentality. For example, ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09324758842 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80804799254 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585209003215 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1429549073 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1764705882 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214325244691 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557305980269 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428464420376 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116348106117 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267883698597 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.