Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?
In the recent days, there is a hotly debated topic related to whether it is beneficial for more household chores and workload being done by robots rather than human or not. In my opinion, I totally believe that this phenomenon is definitely a positive development.
There are many culprit why implementing robots at homes has many benefits. As robots can replace human in doing repetitive tasks that are required to keep their house in order, individuals are able to save time and labour. After working for hours on end, the workers can not recharge their battery but they have to do the household chores and at the results they may feel exhausted and tired. Furthermore, every year citizens spend thousand of hours running repeated errands boring works like washing the dishes or sweeping the floor, if robots are adopted, people will be relieved from household duty and pursue their own’s interest.
Regarding to the merits of robots at work. Although there are those who argue that robots can despoil human’s work which leading to the high rate of unemployment, to some extent, they protect individuals from the job which make them run a higher risk of health problems. For example, those who are employees in the company producing chemical like pesticide or herbicide. Heavily exposure to this kind of liquid can result in bad health, even is the cardiovascular diseases.
In conclusion, I would believe that it is totally optimistic to implement robots to do more task at home and work. This is because, they not only help people to save times and labour but also keep worker away from detrimental substance of work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 61
- The maps give information about a university sports court 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 78
- Task 1 The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'culprits'?
Suggestion: culprits
...a positive development. There are many culprit why implementing robots at homes has ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... Furthermore, every year citizens spend thousand of hours running repeated errands borin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... of health problems. For example, those who are employees in the company producing chem...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9598540146 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57684135209 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624087591241 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.972874404 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276583499217 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106634819532 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819268619806 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169740612819 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510369688556 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.