Given is that, the bar chart illustrates the marks of 3 teams including a, b and c in four consecutive years from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, the first impression of the graph is that team b has won the highest number of points in all four years. Graph also gives the view that team a and c did not get much improvement in their points.
Looking at detail, it is shown that team b had a peak attempt in their marks in 2002. After that a steady fall occured till 2004, then climbed to 55 points in 2005. Interestingly, lowest points of 5 was got by team a in 2002 was taken over by team c in 2005. There is a remarkable improvement was for team a till 2004. But when it reached to 2005, score plummet to 6. Least number of mark was received by team c.
In conclusion, team a and c need to get more improvements to reach near team b.
- the bar chart shows scores of 3 teams a, b nd c over four different seasons. summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant. 70
- Many people like to were fashionable clothes. Why do you think this is the case?Is this a good thing or a bad thing ? 62
- few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. is this a positive or negative trend? 64
- summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
- few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. is this a positive or negative trend? 27
Essay evaluation report
Given is that, the bar chart illustrates the marks of 3 teams
Given is the bar chart which illustrates the marks of 3 teams
lowest points of 5 was got by team a in 2002 was taken over by team c in 2005.
the lowest points of 5 which was got by team a in 2002 was taken over by team c in 2005.
There is a remarkable improvement was for team a
Description: two verbs in one sentence. can you re-write this sentence?
Sentence: After that a steady fall occured till 2004, then climbed to 55 points in 2005.
Error: occured Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 643 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 3.921 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.402 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 28 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 19 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 11 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.004 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.428 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.634 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...ustrates the marks of 3 teams including a, b and c in four consecutive years from ...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...mbed to 55 points in 2005. Interestingly, lowest points of 5 was got by team a in 2002 w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gly, lowest points of 5 was got by team a in 2002 was taken over by team c in 200...
^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...it reached to 2005, score plummet to 6. Least number of mark was received by team c. ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'as for', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254143646409 0.268076937826 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.160220994475 0.116061578633 138% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0662983425414 0.0759168565197 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0165745856354 0.0366838410393 45% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0220994475138 0.0131127313244 169% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132596685083 0.155750635184 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0441988950276 0.0379272487307 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45303142595 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0331491712707 0.0210936926555 157% => OK
Particles: 0.00552486187845 0.00175180941692 315% => OK
Determiners: 0.0883977900552 0.0948980150116 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0110497237569 0.00967000014798 114% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 833.0 1161.00487805 72% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.9 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07926829268 5.90752243213 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.176829268293 0.337110787985 52% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.128048780488 0.247514529752 52% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0731707317073 0.171178102325 43% => More words length more than 7 chars wanted.
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0609756097561 0.112407865282 54% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45303142595 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.546246751206 107% => OK
Word variations: 51.0747350993 49.3433353143 104% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2222222222 23.0094962315 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1661358757 42.9750493124 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 135.714022679 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 23.0094962315 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.689975730869 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.48048780488 270% => OK
Readability: 31.027100271 47.7609492067 65% => OK
Elegance: 2.16666666667 2.94281807926 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163776251599 0.418131533498 39% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.161281883203 0.181151798455 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10957844812 0.0850326197045 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.616117062 0.706616315825 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.244448709287 0.157042692854 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792975032884 0.228904883108 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903663025549 0.108899403657 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.275223851844 0.367819155151 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0354498707902 0.0812612215331 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13716945138 0.316326947829 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953351854795 0.0921553760075 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 4.0 7.1512195122 56% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.