The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line graph compares the amount of enquiries that the Tourist Information Office received in the timescale of six months from January to June in 2011.
Overall, while emails witnessed a downward trend, enquiries in person and telephones had an upward trend over the period surveyed.
Look at the information in more detail, we can see that communication in person hold the bottom position in January with 400 enquiries, which was 500 enquiries lower than that of by letter and email. Nevertheless, in March, enquiries in person had a dramatic climb, from 800 in March to 1900 at the end of surveyed time. Telephone took the lead in January with 900 enquiries, then increased slightly to 1000 enquiries in April and peak at 1600 enquiries in June.
The striking feature was enquiries by letter and email. Although this trend was the runner-up at the beginning of the period, it experienced a considerable plummet to less than 400 enquiries in May and then reached its bottom at 390 at the end of surveyed period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 61
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 73
- The table below gives information about changes in mode of travel in England between 1985 to 2000 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, may, nevertheless, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89595375723 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72017987074 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4728708779 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214221030248 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108767867702 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118010844894 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162015351715 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134368020744 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.