The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001

The bar graph illustrates the average number of hours spent by tutors teaching in three educational levels in four different countries; Japan, Spain, Iceland and USA in the year 2001.

Overall, it is evident that, the number of hours spent teaching is more in the upper secondary in all the nations. Moreover, in all the countries, teachers spent more number of hours in upper secondary level followed by lower secondary and primary level.

In the case of primary level, teachers of America spent most number of hours about 750 hours, and the teachers of Spain spent approximately 650 hours, and the tutors of Japan and Iceland spent 600 hours each.
At the lower secondary level, the teachers of Iceland were least interested in teaching with an average of 600 hours. While, USA holds the top position with the 1000 hours of teaching. Japan and Spain accounted for an average of 650-750 hours.
Finally, in the upper secondary level, the tutors of America were dedicated to teach about 1200 hours in the entire year. However, the Japan teachers were quite neglecting the upper secondary level with just 700 hours. Spain and Iceland spent 900 hours each.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... teaching with an average of 600 hours. While, USA holds the top position with the 10...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9641025641 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35028499957 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441025641026 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6644846021 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264969161811 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119525072958 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921123083808 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174865992124 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858176395239 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.