The bar charts below shows the number of visits to a community website in the first and second year of use.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and mae comparisons with relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the number of users who browsed a community website in two years, starting in September of the first year and ending in August of the second year.
Overall, it could be seen that the figure for website visitors in both years witnessed a fluctuating trend, and users who browsed this website in the second year were higher than in the first year, except for the users who used this website in the August of the second year.
In the first year, the number of people who visited the website began below 5,000 in September, raised gradually to 10,000 in November, and remained the same number of users in December. However, the number of website visitors saw a huge decline in the next two months and dropped to its lowest point in February. After that, this figure recovered rose significantly and hit the ceiling point of 15,000 users in August.
In the second year, the number of community website browsers saw a similar trend as the first year, starting below 5,000 in September, climbing to approximately 20,000 in November, reducing to 10,000, and remaining the same number in March. Subsequently, the number of website users recovered and surged to the highest point in July, at approximately 25,000. Finally, this figure shrunk to 12,500 in August, lower than the figure in the previous year in the same month.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87826086957 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49375780246 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447826086957 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6170068018 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252105593876 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121896029957 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903463803779 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188608362504 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050903934698 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87826086957 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49375780246 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447826086957 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6170068018 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252105593876 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121896029957 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903463803779 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188608362504 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050903934698 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.