The chart below portray the numbers reported on a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five major Australian cities(Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart).
Overall, we can observe that four out of the five cities, have the largest percentage of people who went to a cafe for tea of coffee in the last four weeks. On the contrary, Adelaide has the largest proportion of people that bought instant coffee in the last 4 weeks.
First of all, Melbourne and Hobart have the greatest percentage of citizens who went to a cafe for tea of coffee in the past 4 weeks, followed by Sydney whose fraction was a little more than 3/5th.
Second of all, Hobart and Brisbane had the largest proportion of people buying instant coffee around 54% and 53% respectively. Adelaide, came second with around half of the total number of people in the survey. This was followed by Sydney and Melbourne.
On the Contrary, Sydney and Melbourne were the highest contributors to the market for fresh coffee, as they reported the largest numbers for the percentage of people who bought fresh coffee in the last 4 weeks. Sydney and Melbourne had a score of around 44% and 43%. Hobart was the third largest contributor to the market of fresh coffee, followed by Adelaide and Brisbane.
- Cambridge 15 Test 1 Writing task 1 The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in give Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labeled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, third, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88687782805 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54141591735 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452488687783 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2783262011 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159875710554 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704721495052 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922616849316 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115426785201 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110594128949 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.