The chart and graph below give information about three categories of workers in Australia and unemployment levels in three countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart demonstrates the percentages of three different types of workers in Asutralia, while the line graph shows the levels of unemployment in Spain, Germany, and Italy. Overall, the Australian-original workers accounted for the highest percentage out of the three categories. Additionally, the unemployment rate in Germany increased throughtout the time, while a downward trend happened in the figure of Spain.
Looking at the pie chart, 76% of workers in Autralia was reported as the Australians, making it to the most populous category. Following this figure, there was 11% of workers who spoke English as their main language. Meanwhile, the figure for Non-English speaking people was record at 13% in total, which was ranked in the second position.
Turning to the line chart. Although starting at 4% initially, the employment level of Germany was observed to have an upward trend in the next 6 years and reached roughly 9%. Despite its small decrease in 1999 and 2001, the figure quickly rose and reached the peak in 2005, at nearly 11%. The reported figure for Spain declined over the time from 13% in 1991 to 9% in 2005, in spite of its slight increase in 1993. Finally, the unemployment rate in Italy witnessed a small fluctuation during the period; however, it rebounded to 8% in the end, whose figure was the same that in the beginning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- Topic in the attached picture 11
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, second, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00881057269 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87778175358 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594713656388 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5179278757 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.363636364 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13878647995 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555253382566 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531650181179 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964013235293 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516065036087 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.