The percentages of waste disposal into different methods (landfill, recycled, incineration and other) in various EU countries are presented in the bar chart.
Overall, Landfill sites was the most method used than any other management facility around fifteen EU Countries, while only few countries recycled of waste that they produce. However, there were certain countries used all of methods.
When it was came up to Landfilling, Greece and Ireland were the highest EU countries that used this way of waste management with 90% and 88% respectively compared to just under 10% of Denmark`s indicator, becoming the lowest used of this method. The most waste worked by incineration were done by Denmark and Luxembourg just above 50%, while Spain and The UK were noticeably used only 5% and 8% accordingly.
In 2004, Germany became the most eco-friendly countries in The EU with 65% of recycling and composting waste treatment. In contrast, just around of 10% of waste was used in this way by Greece, UK and Portugal, showing the lowest indicator of environmental-safe of waste disposal. Futhermore, others countries had proportions less than half.
- The pie chart shows adult population in the u S A by race ethnicity according to a census in1997 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the weight assessment of inhabitants of Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 73
- Cases of whooping cough Britain 1940 1990 87
- Percentages of U S adults who are worried about their exposure to the coronavirus in February and March 84
- It has been proposed that citizens should only consume food and drink products that have been produced in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25789473684 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01661603443 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9301598143 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204475313809 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924916733075 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380438480409 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128804849194 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418899580059 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.