The chart below compares the number of people per household* by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001.
The chart shows the contrast between the number of people in the UK families in 1981 and 2001.
Overall, the data for the UK families of two was the highest among all categories. Moreover, the number of big families tended to decrease whereas the opposite happened to the family groups with under two members.
The UK households were mostly families of two with 31% in 1981 and a slight increase of 34% in 2001. In 1981, the rate of people who lived alone was 17% and climbed to 26% 20 years later.
The number of big families in the UK decreased in 20 years. The ratio of the UK families with three members was under 20% in 1981 and fell gradually 20 years later. A similar pattern can also be seen in the proportion of families with four members, which occupied 18% in 1981 and 15% in 2001. The percentages of the UK households with five and six people were under 10% for 20 years. Especially in 2001, the data for a family of six declined from 6% to 2%, ranking the lowest among six family types.
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree 73
- The widespread use of Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of Internet What solutions can you suggest 67
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36363636364 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27922945309 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475935828877 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.469733755 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.6 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261548556521 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131658087835 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107577730256 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215041355508 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124258278897 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.