The chart below compares the number of people per household* by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001.
The chart shows the contrast between the number of people in UK families in 1981 and 2001.
Overall, the data for UK families forming two people was the highest among all categories. Moreover, the number of big families tended to decrease whereas the opposite happened to the family groups with under two members.
The preferred UK household was two-person families with 31% in 1981 and a slight increase of 34% in 2001. In 1981, the rate of people who lived alone was 17% and climbed to 26% 20 years later.
The number of people in UK families that surpassed seemed to decrease in 20 years. The ratio of UK families with three members was under 20% in 1981 and fell gradually 20 years later. A similar pattern can also be seen in the proportion of families with four members, which occupied 18% in 1981 and 15% in 2001. The percentages of UK households forming five and six people were under 10% for 20 years. Especially in 2001, the data for a family of six declined from 6% to 2%, ranking the lowest among six family types.
- Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money Discuss both these views and give your own op 73
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- In many countries children participate in some paid work in their spare time Some people think that this is wrong but others believe that such work will extend children s knowledge and increase their sense of responsibility What is your opinion 73
- Discuss the challenges and opportunities that your community has been facing as a result of the COVID 19 pandemic 56
- Some people think the government funding should be used for supporting art and cultures others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5376344086 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34921014369 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505376344086 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.4328938413 43.030603864 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.4 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279500815965 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140112132938 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105227378129 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223656540113 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114978771235 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.