The chart below compares the number of people per household* by percentage in the
UK in 1981 and 2001.
The chart shows the contrast between the number of people in the UK families in 1981 and 2001.
Overall, the data for the UK families forming two people was the highest among all categories. Moreover, the number of big families tended to decrease whereas the opposite happened to the family groups with under two members.
The preferred UK household type was two-person families, which comprised 31% in 1981 and increased by 3% in 2001. In 1981, the ratio of people who lived alone was 17% and climbed to 26% 20 years later.
The number of members in the UK families that surpassed two seemed to decrease in 20 years. The ratio of UK families of three was under 20% (1981) and fell gradually 20 years later. A similar pattern can be seen in the proportion of families with four members, which occupied 18% (1981) and 15% (2001). The percentages of UK households forming five and six people were under 10% for 20 years. Especially in 2001, the data for a family of six declined from 6% to 2%, ranking the lowest among six family types.
- The table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do you think the advantages of being a celebrity outweigh its disadvantages 78
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57837837838 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3776657409 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 14.6164291125 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.7 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279010464438 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133632034622 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104373103548 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220311485508 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115607051867 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.