The chart below gives informatin the resul of a british survey on the types of houses people liked taken in 2005

Essay topics:

The chart below gives informatin the resul of a british survey on the types of houses people liked, taken in 2005.

The graph demonstrates four different types of houses, which liked outer world of UK in 2005.
Overall, in this diagram we can see that very high percentage related to flats of London (about 58%), but if we look to terraced houses it sharply decreased. Flats of Cambridge demonstrated 20%, terraced houses of this country slowly went down, but became to detached houses it dramatically rose. Very small number belong to detached houses of London.
Four different houses of Oxford exhibited fluctuation and overall was less than 30%. Residents of Cambridge flats indicated 20%.The second type of rented apartment was terraced houses, Oxford illustrated almost the similar percentage with the Cambridge flats. The next identical percentages pertain to London and the terraced houses of Cambridge.
An interesting fact is that, if previous houses of Cambridge were less than 20 %, became to detached houses it dramatically rose. London’s houses exhibited small number, but in semi-detached houses London sharply climbed to 18percentage.The last two countries indicated equal number.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-09-28 EnglishUSA_uz 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...idents of Cambridge flats indicated 20%.The second type of rented apartment was ter...
^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... London sharply climbed to 18percentage.The last two countries indicated equal numb...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5696969697 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88272367821 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4303121102 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125851365557 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615843646424 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305267456139 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896889051677 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290401381991 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.