The bar chart illustrates Australian female's age when they gave birth their first sapling in between 1966 to 2006.
Overall, it is clearly seen that below 19 to 24 years women' s giving birth to their first child is showing downward trend, however, the opposite was true for that of women aged from 30 to 39. Also, over forty female did not tend to take child.
In 1966, nearly 30% women took birth to their first child who were under 19, however, 19-24 ages of women were showed double from below 19. Both were decreasing in the next years which was only 10% and below one third respectively in 2006. Female who were in young age ( 25-30) receive first baby was nearly over a one third which was inclined steadily in 1986 by a a half but decreased by below two fifth in 2006.
However, 30-34 ages of females were showed upward trend as the proportion of first baby was nearly 10% in 1966, but inclined significantly and reached at 45% in 2006. Similarly, women who are under 34-39, they gave birth to their baby was nearly 8% and grew up fastly by nearly one third in 2006. In contrast, over 40 female showed less interest to conceive first child which was nearly 5% in all over the period.
- Many people aim to acheive balance their work and life but only a few get succeed why is this Suggest some ways to bring the balance 56
- A rise in the standard of living in a country seems to only benefits cities rather than rural areas What problems might this difference cause How might the problems be reduced 73
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing the ceremic pot 100
- The bar chart shows British Emigration selected to destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'female' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'females'.
Suggestion: females
...en aged from 30 to 39. Also, over forty female did not tend to take child. In 1966,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... next years which was only 10% and below one third respectively in 2006. Female w...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly in 2006. Female who were in young age 25-30 receive first baby was nearly over...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
... which was inclined steadily in 1986 by a a half but decreased by below two fifth ...
^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... which was inclined steadily in 1986 by a a half but decreased by below two fift...
^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
... which was inclined steadily in 1986 by a a half but decreased by below two fifth ...
^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eadily in 1986 by a a half but decreased by below two fifth in 2006. However, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, similarly, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46575342466 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10132997527 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529680365297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1829151091 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356233824366 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166202226217 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114124302886 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267916894996 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907791475118 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.