The first chart below shows then umber of airline crew pilots stewards etc needed to fly a passenger plane between Australia and a number of other countries The second chart shows the number of passenger complaints per plane journey made on these routes a

Essay topics:

The first chart below shows then umber of airline crew(pilots, stewards etc) needed to fly a passenger plane between Australia and a number of other countries. The second chart shows the number of passenger complaints per plane journey made on these routes, and average kilogram (kg) weight of luggage (or baggage) carried per passenger .

The given charts evince some information about the airline crew number from Australia to some miscellaneous countries, the amount of dissatisfied passenger per plan, and the medium weight baggage, which is carrying by them.

Turning to the number of crew on each plane, destination of Germany has the highest number (15), then the second highest belongs to Indonesia (11). This number for Malaysia destination is 8, and stands in New Zealand at 6, which less than halves of the maximum.

Regarding to the complaining passenger numbers, we can see a reverse trend as to the crew number. It is the minimum in Germany (about 1), followed by Indonesia and Malaysia with approximately 3. For destination of New Zealand, this is extreme with more than 5 dissatisfied persons.

With respect to mean burden of luggage, it has downright similar pattern to crew number. The passengers of destination of Germany has the weightiest luggage with about 37 Kg, and Indonesia is the second heaviest (just above 30 kg). it is 30 kg for Malaysia, and then stands 15 Kg for New Zealand, which is less than 50% of Germany.

To recapitulate briefly, it seems there is a positive relationship between the number of crew and the average weight of baggage. Notwithstanding, a negative reflection can be seen between the crew number and the complaining passengers.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-10 ata 81 view
Essays by user ata :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, regarding, second, so, then, as to, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0269058296 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95675222495 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7457785938 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.909090909 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22198343534 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084771254276 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663759337695 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129795859024 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482551015743 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.