The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
The report derives from the presented side-bar chart delineating an average family expenditure from their weekly income in a particular country in 1968 and in 2018.
Generally speaking, the spending pattern of households had changed significantly in five decades. Housing and recreation overtook food as the principal sources of pay-out in 2018.
A glance at the graph reveals that, food used to consume about 35% of households weekly income in 1968. In 2018, this figure declined to almost half at 17% while residence and leisure increased to almost double with 18% and 22% respectively. Transportation is another category, which saw a growth approximately from 8% to 13%. Payment structure on residential goods remained equal with under 10% in both years.
On the other hand, all the other categories were never as high as 10% in 1968. Moreover, spending on fuel and power as well as on personal items demonstrated a slight decrease of about 2% and 4% respectively. In terms of apparel and footwear, the number in 2018 was almost half compared to 1958 (around 10% and 20% respectively).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 78
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 11
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 67
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 11
- Present a written argument or case to an educated non specialist audience on the following topic Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned equal with under 10% in both years. On the other hand, all the other categor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12290502793 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92880258559 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653631284916 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3685951411 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203903862515 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638777780058 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865879217325 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119627890778 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099203908088 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.