The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the changes that have taken place in the weekly expenditure of families in 1968 and 2018.
Overall, while spending on food, fuel and power, clothing and footware, and personal goods decreased, upward trends were occurring in the spending on housing, transport, and leisure, with the exception of household goods. Additionally, the largest proportion of spending per week was spent on food in 1968, and on leisure in 2018.
In 1968, the total expenditure on food was 35% and quickly declined by nearly half 50 years later. A similar trend was observed in the spending on clothing and footwear and personal goods, at 10% and 7% in 1968. Likewise, the figure for fuel and power experienced a slight drop from 6% in 1968 to 4% in 2018.
On the other hand, one-tenth of the total expenditure was on housing in 1968, almost doubling in 2018. Furthermore, transport and leisure had nearly the same proportion in 1968, at 8%, and increased to 14% and 22% respectively, in 2018. Meanwhile, the spending on household goods remained unchanged over the 50-year period, at 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
- The table below gives information about the temperatures and hours of daylight during the same weekend in two cities in May 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and the plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ing on housing, transport, and leisure, with the exception of household goods. Additionally, the larg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, likewise, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96195652174 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75782419339 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5877573975 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125615870194 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622939505701 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537417793175 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093239516837 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423369552509 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.