The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the changes that have taken place in the weekly income spent by families in a specific country in the two years 1968 and 2018.
Overall, while spending on food, fuel and power, clothing and footwear, and personal goods witnessed a decrease, there were upward trends in spending on housing, transport, and leisure, with the exception of household goods. In addition, the largest proportion of weekly income was spent on food in 1968, and on leisure in 2018.
In 1968, food made up the highest percentage of total expenditure, at 35%; however, this figure sharply declined by nearly 50% in 2018. A similar trend had taken place in weekly spending on personal goods and clothing and footware, with the initial figures in 1968 of 7% and 10% respectively. Finally, the figure for fuel and power dropped from roughly 6% in 1968 to 4% in 2018 of the total expenditure per week.
On the other hand, one-tenth of weekly spending was on housing in 1968, almost double in the next 50 years. Moreover, the figures for both transport and leisure were the same, at nearly 8% in 1968, and afterwards increased to approximately 14% and 22% respectively, in 2018. Meanwhile, throughout 50 years, the data for household goods remained stable at 8%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 84 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 73 view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp 60 view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp view
Essays by user minhnhat2002 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ing on housing, transport, and leisure, with the exception of household goods. In addition, the large...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89719626168 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65790514845 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556074766355 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8329846568 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164572145704 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804772442576 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733241266678 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120692450044 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655299728494 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.