The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
The given bar graph below illustrates the average household weekly expenditure on different items and services in a particular country in two years: 1968 and 2018.
Overall, it is clear that the investment on food, energy, fashion and personal goods decline over the period, while the reverse was true for housing, transport and leisure. However, similar amount was spent on household goods in both years.
According to the graph, in 1968, the food accounted to be the most heavily expensed area, consuming over third portion of the weekly income, which became half after 5 decades. Similarly, under 10% of the earning went on fuel and power, clothing and foot wear, and personal goods in 1968, and after half century, the percentage of investment on these items dropped to under 5. In contrast, the expenditure on housing, leisure and transport grew over the period. The first two nearly double from roughly 10% to 20%, while the last one rose only by 6% on top of 8% in 1968. Finally, 8% of the money earned were squandered on households in 1968, and this ratio did not go under any changes in 50 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 78
- The graph shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 89
- The graph shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 89
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 89
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, similarly, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83246073298 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45244231073 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633507853403 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4156503949 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127971972312 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526124964002 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054336866462 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957584481912 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651189741453 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.