The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make relevant comparisons

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make relevant comparisons.

The chart show we the average weekly spendinh by families in 1968 and 2018. We can see in 1968 a family usually spend most of the weekly spending in food about 35 percent and least about 6 percent in fuel and power while spend about 8 to 10 percent in other thing like housing, clothing and footware, househlod goods, personal goods, transport and leisure . In 2018 lots have change now a family spend a lot about 17 to 22 percent of their weekly spending in food, housing and leisure, about 8 to 14 percent in household goods and transport while only spend about 8 to 10 percent in fuel and power, clothing and footware and personal goods. When compair the number you can see that the most significant decrease from 1968 to 2018 is food with a decrease of 18 percent from 35 to 17 percent and the most significant increase is leisure with a 13 percent incease from 9 to 22 percent and only household goods stayed the same at 8 percent.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 84 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 73 view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp 60 view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp view
Essays by user tran quynh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s, personal goods, transport and leisure . In 2018 lots have change now a family s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41040462428 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35279382645 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485549132948 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.5324396048 43.030603864 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.75 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.25 22.9334400587 189% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115063559403 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104838883654 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646642321866 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115063559403 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.3 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.19 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.