The chart below gives information about how famlilies in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparision where relevant.
The provided bar chart illustrates the percentages of average expenditure per week in a particular country during the years 1968 and 2018.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the significantly reduced expanse for food and the substantially high spending for housing, leisure and transport after 5 decades indicate that the preference for these things had overtaken food as the largest area of expenditure. Among the other categories, there was decline in the proportion of income spent on fuel and power, clothing and footware, as well as personal goods, while household goods remained relatively stable.
In 1968, precisely 35% of total expenses were dedicated to food, representing over a third of all expenditure combined. In contrast, each of the other categories, such as fuel and power, household goods, personal goods, transport, represented at a mere 6% to 8% of the budget. In addition, the money spent on housing, clothing and leisure accounted for approximately 10% each.
Fast forward to 2018, a remarkable shift in spending patterns was observed. Families tripled their earnings for leisure, reaching around 23% making it the highest category. Movever, larger propotion of their weekly income was allocated to housing, which experienced an overall rise by 9%, and transport, which displayed a 13% increased. Futhermore, clothing and footware, fuel and power, personal goods experienced a lower spending share in 2018 compared with 1968, at around 5%, while household goods showing no change over the 50-year span. However, there was a downward trend in the percentage of money used for food, dropped by half to approximately 17%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | tran quynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | nhathongk2003 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | Fara Has | 78 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ow 70
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing creates problems for government Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extend do the advantages of having an ageing populat 56
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ransport, represented at a mere 6% to 8% of the budget. In addition, the money sp...
^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nted at a mere 6% to 8% of the budget. In addition, the money spent on housing, c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, third, well, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40458015267 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94176526394 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603053435115 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3285768942 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.727272727 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978811687373 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404482201208 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395474241742 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07088397774 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483728465392 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ransport, represented at a mere 6% to 8% of the budget. In addition, the money sp...
^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nted at a mere 6% to 8% of the budget. In addition, the money spent on housing, c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, third, well, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40458015267 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94176526394 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603053435115 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3285768942 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.727272727 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978811687373 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404482201208 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395474241742 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07088397774 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483728465392 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.