The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent
their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart below shows the percentage of weekly income used by families in one country to pay for eight items over two years: 1968 and 2018.
In 1968, 35% of the wages of families in this area were used to pay for food. Spending on housing, clothing and footwear accounts for about 10%, and the numbers for leisure, transportation, personal goods and household goods are also roughly the same (about 8%). In contrast, only a small fraction of weekly income is used for fuel and power, with about 6%.
After half a century, in 2018 the different spending patterns evolved even further. Families have more than tripled their leisure time to about 23% since 1968, reaching a peak. In addition, they also spend most of their weekly earnings on transportation and housing, about 14% and 18% respectively. In contrast when spending on food halved, we saw a sharp decline in spending on fuel and power, clothing and footwear, and personal goods, by 5% or less, reaching the minimum level. After all household goods are the only cost constant at 7%
Overall, the highest level of household spending in 1968 was on food while the highest level of spending was on leisure spending in 2018. Among these categories, food, fuel and power , clothes and footware as well as personal goods tended to decrease compared to 1968 while housing, transport and leisure increased and the remaining group of goods (household goods) remained unchanged
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you thing this is a positive or a negative development 56
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 84
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ing, about 14% and 18% respectively. In contrast when spending on food halved, we saw a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g these categories, food, fuel and power , clothes and footware as well as persona...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, after all, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9173553719 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5075678441 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3124295166 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148640758695 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721753222955 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666449485672 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116119767603 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770437941957 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.