The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
The bar chart illustrates changes in the percentages of Canadian people using social networking sites in the year 2014 and 2015.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the proportions of two sites or more, whereas the figures for those who used only one site or no sites showed a reverse pattern. It is also clear that the majority of Canadian citizens visiting one site was highest over the given period.
In 2014, people with one social networking site accounted for the highest percentage compared to the others, at 36%, followed by a significant decrease of 8% in 2015. In comparison, the proportion of users who did not use any social networking sites in 2014 was just over a fifth (22%) before falling by only 1% a year later.
At the same time, the rates of Canadians who used two sites, three sites, four sites and five sites were 23%, 12%, 5% and 2% respectively in 2014. Afterwards, all these groups saw a steady rise in the following year, ranging from 1% to 4%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Hanabi | view | |
| 2022-01-27 | Chloe Pham | view | |
| 2022-01-19 | koshagohil | 67 | view |
- The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 78
- MORE AND MORE CHILDREN IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE BECOMING OVERWEIGHT THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN WEALTHY COUNTRIES CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS TREND 89
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tworking sites in the year 2014 and 2015 Overall there were general upward trends...
^^^
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... of Canadian citizens visiting one site was highest over the given period In 2014 people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e site was highest over the given period In 2014 people with one social networkin...
^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...22 before falling by only 1 a year later At the same time the rates of Canadians ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49425287356 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52209158513 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 174.0 22.4926829268 774% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 782.0 112.824112599 693% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 174.0 22.9334400587 759% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.0 5.23603664747 401% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317185789368 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317185789368 0.103423049105 307% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233680119331 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115721645619 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 86.7 13.2329268293 655% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -88.21 61.2550243902 -144% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 68.8 10.3012195122 668% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.95 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.72 8.06136585366 195% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 71.6 10.9970731707 651% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.