The bar charts represents the percentage of people in Canada using multiple social networking sites for two years including 2014 and 2015.
Overall, about one fifth people living in Canada uses no social networking sites, whereas, approximately 30% Canadians of the total population uses one social networking site in the year 2014 and 2015.
The percentage of people using no social sites decreased insignificantly in 2015. However, 36% of Canadians used one social networking sites in 2014 and the number decreased in 2015 making approximately one third of the total population.
In 2014, 23% people used two sites for social networking, which was increased a little bit in 2015 making about one fourth of the total population. The number of people using three sites increased by 4% in 2015, which constituted 16%. Very few people used four sites in 2014 for social networking, which slightly increased in 2015 making only 8%. Only 2% Canadians used five sites for social networking which was increased by only 2% in the year 2015.
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 67
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 61
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 66
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- Clay pots of a particular specific design have earlier been found in the surrounding area of the prehistoric village of Karia and so were supposed to have been made exclusively by the people from Karia However of late archeologists discovered a Karian cla 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'represent'.
Suggestion: represent
The bar charts represents the percentage of people in Canada usin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ocial networking, which was increased a little bit in 2015 making about one fourth of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13529411765 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7313950705 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417647058824 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6777039507 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506701829077 0.215688989381 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.294512809898 0.103423049105 285% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678199417383 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377864381867 0.15604864568 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276041707648 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.