The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart shows the percentage of people using multiple social networking sites between the year 2014 to year 2015. In both years 2014 & 2015, the percentage of people using only one networking site is highest among the rest whereas the percentage of people using two sites holds the second position on the chart. On third position, there is the percentage of people browsing Internet without using any networking site. It can be seen that people using more than three sites is quite rare and lowest number of percentage in both years is of the people using five networking sites. Furthermore, in the year 2014, people used only one networking sites relatively more than in the year 2015. But in contrast, people used two sites more in 2015 than in 2014. On the other hand, the percentage of people using no sites is higher in 2014 than in 2015. Additionally, in 2015, the percentage of people using more than two sites are relatively higher from 2014 with having the lowest percentage of people using five sites. In conclusion, it is shown from survey that people usually use only one networking site when browsing internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Hanabi | view | |
| 2022-01-27 | Chloe Pham | view | |
| 2021-10-06 | Hamza khan12 | 67 | view |
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom 73
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 56
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, second, so, third, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82989690722 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42909170721 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427835051546 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.346827566 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275245316204 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17701433105 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359137742144 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275245316204 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.