The chart below gives information on the numbers of workers in different occupations who migrated to Australia between 2009 and 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the number of migrants in four different categories including an accountant, cook, software engineer, and computer programmer from 2009 to 2012 in Australia
Overall, compared to other workers, the number of migrations of computer programmers was very low in all the given four years. The other three job seekers have a significant number though, accountants hold the highest position.
In the beginning, 20000 accountants migrated to Australia in 2009 which increased to 28 thousand after one year. In the flowing years, the graph reduced and remained lower than 20000 by 2012. Compared to cooks, the number of software engineer graph increased over the year from 19000 in 2009 and it declined to 17000 by 2012. Furthermore, the digit of cooks has some alterations and remained below 20000 in all four years and it was only 15000 in 2010.
Regarding computer programmers, only 2000 people migrated to Australia in 2009 and 2011 whereas, the number escalated to 5000 at the end of the graph.
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water use in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1987 and 2007
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place in west Park secondary school since it s construction in 1950 44
- Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language in primary school rather than secondary school. D o the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16167664671 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74460605896 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7333497711 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153323005615 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069930408739 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361317401059 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975811904406 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249658858202 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.