The chart below provides information on the methods of waste disposal in four European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates four types of waste disposal including biological treatment, landfill, burning, and recycling in the Netherlands, Italy Spain, and the UK. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, the most significant type of waste disposal in the UK was biological treatment while the other three countries use a landfill method for their major disposal.
Regarding the landfill method of waste disposal, Spain was the highest with 45% and the UK was the lowest with a mere 5%. However, Netherlands and Italy use this method around 41% and 40% respectively. However, another main kind of waste disposal was the biological treatment which was mainly used by the UK with 45% whilst, the Netherlands use this method with only 10%.
In terms of burning the Netherlands was at the top with 28% and Spain accounts for the bottom at only 5%. Moreover,compared to other three methods burning was the least methods of waste disposal among all the four countries which is below 25%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , compared
...unts for the bottom at only 5%. Moreover,compared to other three methods burning was the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11656441718 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80539207562 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1149573312 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153589056975 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735124747551 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635896893353 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103300605064 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211598385052 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.