The chart below show how frequently people in USA ate in fastfood restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The given graph compares proportion of usa people who ate in junk foods frequently in 2003,2006 and 2013.
It is clear that in 10 year period on average a high amount of people spend their time at least once week or once or twice week to eat at fast food restaurants.It is interesting point to notice in similar period of time percentage of people who never had outdoor foods is fairly similar to every day fast-food consumers.
In 2006 and 2013 there is no change in rate of people who ate fast foods everyday , who never had that kind of snacks and people who ordered just few times a year remaind fairly stable at same number, However its witness decline since 2003, in other hand level of several times a week or once week consumers after 3 year experienced increase and reached to 20% and 33% respectively.Level of usa habitats who enjoyed their meal at restaurants once or twice month was 30% at first then fell 5 percent and at end of 2013 reached to approximately 33%.
- The diagram below shows how a solar powered water pump works. 61
- The graph below shows the proprotion of our differnt materials that were recycled from 1982 t0 2010 in a particular country. 56
- The chart below show how frequently people in USA ate in fastfood restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- Te graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across faculties of a major university in 2012
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by theTourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ce week to eat at fast food restaurants.It is interesting point to notice in simil...
^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... interesting point to notice in similar period of time percentage of people who never had outd...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to everyday'?
Suggestion: to everyday
...ver had outdoor foods is fairly similar to every day fast-food consumers. In 2006 and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ge in rate of people who ate fast foods everyday , who never had that kind of snacks and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...te of people who ate fast foods everyday , who never had that kind of snacks and p...
^^
Line 9, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 3 year experienced increase and reached to 20% and 33% respectively.Level of usa...
^^
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Level
...nd reached to 20% and 33% respectively.Level of usa habitats who enjoyed their meal ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, at least, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57062146893 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62058629725 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 59.0 22.4926829268 262% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 180.879947909 43.030603864 420% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 269.666666667 112.824112599 239% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 59.0 22.9334400587 257% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152577244893 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148191223308 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105083274484 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148191223308 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105083274484 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.6 13.2329268293 224% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 61.2550243902 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.9 10.3012195122 232% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 25.6 10.9970731707 233% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 11.0658536585 271% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.