The chart below show information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The given bar graph illustrates average house prices in five cities of a country which are New York, Madrid,Tokyo,Frankfurt and London from 1990to 2002 and it's also compare its percentage change from 1989 prices.
Overall, London and Tokyo ended up with extreme negative changes over the years while new York and Madrid experienced a positive changes in average house prices but London has the highest one at the ended of the years even though, there were periods of fluctuations.
Looking at the average house price in 1990 to 1995, change in percentage experienced in New York was at -5% while that of Madrid and Frankfurt have positive change of 2 and 3 percentage respectively. Both Tokyo and London have the extreme price of - 7.5 each.
Between 1996 and 2002, there is relatively new changes observed now. New York that had a negative house price of -5% in earlier years now has a positive 5% price changes that of Madrid increased slightly to 4.5%. Tokyo still have a negative percentage in its price change,although, it was - 7.5% before it's now -5%. A little drop was seen in average house price for Frankfurt to 1% while that of London soared from negative price of-7.5% to 12% at the end of 2002, and it's the city that has the greatest price change among the five cities. It's followed by new York and Madrid of 5% and 4% respectively. While Tokyo has the lowest negative price change of -5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Tokyo
... of a country which are New York, Madrid,Tokyo,Frankfurt and London from 1990to 2002 a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... while that of Madrid and Frankfurt have positive change of 2 and 3 percentage re...
^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , although
... negative percentage in its price change,although, it was - 7.5% before its now -5%. A li...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 469, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... of-7.5% to 12% at the end of 2002, and its the city that has the greatest price ch...
^^^
Line 4, column 603, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...k and Madrid of 5% and 4% respectively. While Tokyo has the lowest negative price cha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7306122449 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71207923876 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45306122449 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.0781834694 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335916203129 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155063179576 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931153156173 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234381798911 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459207389579 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.