The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The bar graph illustrates the amount of money spent on fast food in Britain by three different income groups in 1990. Also, the line graph provides information on consumption of fast food in the UK within the period of 1970 and 1990.
The preference for fast food fluctuated in the groups. Hamburger, for instance, prevailed in both the high and average income groups since over 40 and 30 pence spent per person weekly; the second most preferable fast food was pizza with 18 pence in the high income group, whereas fish and chips was found to be the second with 25 pence in the average group. In contrast, the most favorite fast food was fish and chips in the low income group; where over 15 pence spent on the food weekly per person, while 13 and 8 pence spent on hamburger and pizza, respectively.
The line graph shows that consumption of hamburgers and fish and chips increased substantially from under 100 grams in 1970 to 300 and 500 grams in 1990, respectively. Consumption of pizza, in contrast, decreased from 300 grams in 1970 to just over 200 grams at the end of the given period.
The infographics indicate fish and chips was favorite fast food in the UK in 1990 since 500 grams of the food were consumed per person weekly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | aimsonlyband6 | 60 | view |
| 2019-02-23 | raznava | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-02 | Hyacinthos | 76 | view |
| 2017-05-07 | Nugman | 67 | view |
| 2015-04-14 | Saeed2 | 70 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- What discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country? 89
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries: China and India. 67
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 73
- The line graph below shows the annual number of visits to Australia by overseas tourists. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the tourists came from. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 565, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t on hamburger and pizza, respectively. The line graph shows that consumption of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, whereas, while, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61538461538 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47143339927 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6678503687 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284540927015 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148438163856 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799216120154 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176520596297 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893999056085 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.