It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
Throughout its history, mankind has been treating a child nurture very carefully since children are next generation who will be responsible for the next generation. Thus, it is significant to teach good behaviour to children since an early childhood; however, there is a controversial question about methods of teaching them: whether to teach good behaviour via a punishment or to use less severe approaches such as examples and life lessons. In my opinion, punishing children in order to teach to distinguish right from wrong from wrong has many disadvantages; hence, the other methods should be used.
Teaching good behaviour to children is vital for parents since it appears to mould a child's mind to discern bad habits and good ones. Parents, therefore, use various approaches to help them to learn that distinction. Parents who decide to use punishment to educate children for good behaviour, for instance, usually risk to damage a child's mental health since severe methods of nurturing fail to fit the child's unmolded psychology. On the other hand, there is an example which indicates that some cultures which involve the severe methods in a child nurture have relatively more obedient young people than their counterparts who use less severe methods, which, in turn, ensures a better control over children to teach them good behaviours.
Bearing in mind that using punishment is harmful for children's health, my preference is to teach good behaviours to children via examples and life lessons. A father, for example, is a role model for his offsprings. Thus, if the father shows good behaviours per se every day, his children will learn good manners by examples.
In conclusion, nurturing children via punishment has disadvantages, thus, either parents or educational institutes should not use that method unless it is a cultural peculiarity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | eslamyousry | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | shihan99 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | kingdangyeu0606 | 22 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Mimibae 985 | 56 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in1930 and 2010. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries: China and India. 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your op 70
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 496, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'distinguishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: distinguishing
...n, punishing children in order to teach to distinguish right from wrong from wrong has many di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 517, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'from wrong'.
Suggestion: from wrong
... in order to teach to distinguish right from wrong from wrong has many disadvantages; hence, the othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od unless it is a cultural peculiarity.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259365994236 0.247107183377 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.149855907781 0.155533422707 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112391930836 0.0946595960268 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0345821325648 0.0501214627716 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0345821325648 0.0437548338989 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109510086455 0.122226691241 90% => OK
Participles: 0.028818443804 0.0403226058552 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.98561310147 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0518731988473 0.0326793684256 159% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0634005763689 0.0861772015684 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0115273775216 0.021408717616 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0172910662824 0.011925033212 145% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1884.0 1933.35771543 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 316.048096192 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.36486486486 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391891891892 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.327702702703 0.28420135186 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.243243243243 0.203846283523 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152027027027 0.137316102897 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98561310147 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.037074148 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.56093040696 98% => OK
Word variations: 57.0716059468 60.7387585426 94% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0891783567 68% => OK
Sentence length: 26.9090909091 20.7743622355 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0521154399 49.517814964 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.272727273 127.492653851 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7743622355 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.814263465372 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 59.6793611794 49.1944974215 121% => OK
Elegance: 1.81578947368 1.69124875643 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359060455551 0.332605444948 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123923778062 0.102741220458 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.052502713719 0.0668466124924 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.610028802131 0.534860350844 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163065256177 0.148594505496 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164763937786 0.134430193775 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810827396886 0.0742795772207 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.313829128017 0.324371583561 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.135142922237 0.0638462369009 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23108972153 0.228012699653 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660921212926 0.058150111329 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9