The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The given illustrations depict data about the money spent by British people on fast foods and also display the Average Consumption of three food items in a span of #0 years, ranging from 1970-1990.
Beginning with the bar graph, the average expenses for hamburger food items is the highest amongst above and middle income earners, at around 42 and 32 pences respectively, in contrast, low income groups spent a shade under 15 pences for the said items. Fish and chips expenditure is highest in the middle class at exactly 25 pences per week, the two income groups, above and low earners, avail the item at an approximate average of 17 pences per week. Lastly, pizza purchases is lowest for both middle and low income parties at about 12 and 7 pences accordingly, while with high earners, average purchases is at 20 pences within the same week period.
Moving on with the line graph, hamburger consumption solidly displays an upward trend registering at about 100 grammes in 1970 then catapulted to more than 500 grammes by 1990. Also illustrating an increase in consumption, pizzas, tallied to short of 300 grammes by 1990, compared to fish and chips that started at 300 grammes in 1970 then dipped with the lowest point at 200 grammes by 1985 before recovering and increasing to around 230 grammes by 1990.
In closing, hamburgers, in terms of consumption were favored by both above and middle income earners in Britain. In addition, in a span of 30 years the average consumptions for both hamburgers and pizzas exhibited an upward trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gulbakhyt_90 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Bao Linh Le | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | khaled94 | 11 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | Metallica | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-17 | Canmed | 67 | view |
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advan 84
- Millions of people every year move to English-speaking countries such as Australia, Britain or America, in order to study at school, college or university.Why do so many people want to study in English? Why is English such an important international langu 56
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?Use your own ideas knowledge and exp 56
- The chart below give information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- You have had a bank account for a few years. Recently you received a letter from the bank stating that your account is $240 overdrawn and that you will be charged $70 which will be taken directly from your account. You know that this information is incorr 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ulted to more than 500 grammes by 1990. Also illustrating an increase in consumption...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, lastly, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91221374046 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62280400874 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541984732824 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1858780034 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.875 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.75 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118602841596 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628483331749 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383924996647 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834060830201 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414889834246 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.