In this report we will take a look on the weekly expenditure of the Britain people on fast food.
Firstly, we see that the high income people spend over 40 pence per week on hamburgers while the low-income spend below 15 pence, they spend near the 20 pence on pizzas while low income spend only 8 per week but the unexpected is that the low-income spend slightly equal to the high income in fish and chips.
Going to the average income they spend above the 30 pence on hamburger, 25 on fish and chips and 12 pence on pizzas.
In the second graph there is a relation between the consumption in grams of pizzas, hamburgers, and fish in years from 1970-1990 so we will find out that in 1970 fish was the highest with 300 grams and pizzas were the least with 30 grams while hamburgers were slightly below 100 grams.
The surprise here is that the fish consumption is slightly decreasing over years while hamburgers and pizzas kept going up, so if fish for example we find it decreasing till reaching 200 grams in 1985 while hamburgers extremely jumped recording 400 grams and 150 grams for pizzas.
Finally, in 1990 hamburgers kept rising to above 550 grams, pizzas 290 grams and fishes are 230 grams.
- the table below shows the consumer durables owned in Britain 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.» You should write at least 150 wor 11
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up. To what extent do you agree or 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5787037037 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31128898146 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.7521851597 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.833333333 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0857629804969 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522629769495 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659416689448 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522629769495 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659416689448 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.