The bar chart compares the annal rice yield in 4 countries in 1995, 2005 and2015.
It is clear that there was a slight increase in the total of rice that was produced among the four countries. In all of these years, A and B kept high yield of rice, almost ten times more than C and D.
Looking first at the countries of high rice production, A produced roughly 45 million tonnes of rice and the figure for B was around 36 million tonnes in 1995. Yearly rice production in A rose steadily in the flollowing 20 years and reached 50 in 2015. In the contrast, rice yield in B increased dramatically by almost 10 million tonnes in 2005 but then dropped to about 43 million tones in the year of 2015.
With regard to contries of lower rice yield, annual rice production in C was almost 6 million tonnes while D produced only half of that in 1995. There was a marginal growth in C's rice production in 2005 but then it fell back to 1995 levels finally in 2015. The latter country kept the same production in 2005 and doubled it to the similar amount of C in 2015.
- The maps below show the changes of a school from 1985 to present time Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 11
- The diagrams show the structure of solar panel and its use 67
- Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Currently many people fail to balance the work with the other parts of lives what are the reasons and how to solve it 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, look, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26865671642 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3589960271 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517412935323 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5882422621 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386445713818 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176701026714 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944643898376 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257011483121 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129448676471 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.