The line graph demonstrates the expense for the most part from four distinct cell phones contractor every month in a particular European nation reckoned in the first three quarters of 2002.
What stands out is that alpha, domo, lex were seen an upward trends from the given period. By contrast, sim TX was the only mobile decreased.
In the first month of 2002, Alpha offered the lowest price for their clients at 5 euros. The cost had remained relatively stable in the next 6 months before surged to 25 euros in September. Whereas, Domo’s users initially had to pay the highest price at 15 euros and the steady increase did not cease. It got plateau in May and Jun then reached the peak at 25 euros, but went down slightly until September. Similarly to Lex, there was a gradual growth in price from about 17 euros to approximately 20 euros in September, despite of some insignificant decline.
Turning to Sim TX, its cost was higher than Alpha in the first place at nearly 10 euros. After peaking at 14 euros in June, the average cost of sim TX went down to its original cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...but went down slightly until September. Similarly to Lex, there was a gradual growth in p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, similarly, so, then, whereas, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5824742268 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39843649252 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670103092784 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4665600242 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202935175423 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753429574503 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609622475428 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118718262432 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623995852159 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.