Financially disadvantaged students tend to stand a lower chance of pursuing higher education than others. In sympathy with them, some people believe the government should entitle such students to places in universities so that there would be no inequality in education attainment. From a personal perspective, I am strongly against this notion due to several reasons presented below.
On the other hand, it should be noticed that this proposal might seem not to be so realistic. Ensuring a place for every student in a country would undoubtedly be an insurmountable task for governments, especially for those running developing countries. Indeed, the total number of highschool leavers in any given year would always outweighs the number of seats available at all universities nationwide, which means that for this idea to be implemented, an unfeasibly exorbitant amount of governmental funding must be spent on building new schools and other infrastructure such as dormitory to ensure the needs of all students.
Another striking point is that the prospects of a universal higher education system might create a crisis in the labour market. If this idea is put into practice, white-collar jobs would always be targeted by university graduates - which would be virtually everyone - because of much better environment and salary, meanwhile manual jobs would incur a great loss of potential labours. This possible trend is extremely dangerous to the economic development of a country, thus adopting this proposal might seem to be merely absurd and unreasonable of the governments.
In conclusion, the risk of giving every student access to higher education regardless of their background is not worth taking at all due to its potential drawbacks mentioned above. Although the current higher educational system might not be completely fair, it seems to be the best available one and any change could have unintended consequences if not carefully speculated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'outweigh'
Suggestion: outweigh
... leavers in any given year would always outweighs the number of seats available at all un...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es - which would be virtually everyone - because of much better environment and s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41967213115 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07272667972 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.2403140575 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.272727273 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103802952464 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469382130727 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652813672778 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757901742206 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639121956692 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.