The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro
The line graph illustrates the changes in the monthly charges of four different mobile phones in a European country between January to September in 2002. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in most categories, except for Sim TX that bucked the trend.
In particular, when it comes to Alpha, the cost fluctuated between 5 and roughly 7 euros in the first six months, which constantly accounted for the smallest numbers. At this point, the graph witnessed a dramatic rise of 20 euros to a peak of 25 euros in the charge in September.
Similarly, regarding Lex, the cost of contract fluctuated between 10 and less than 15 euros from January to June with a low of 10 euros in February before growing to a high of around 18 euros in September. Concerning Domo, the figure fluctuated between 15 to about 17 euros in the first four months, then increasing considerably to a peak of 25 euros in July, which consecutively constituted the highest scores. Afterwards, the month September underwent a gradual decrease to around 23 euros in the charge.
In stark contrast, in terms of Sim TX, the charge fluctuated at 10 euros from January to May before growing to below 15 euros in June. It can be seen that the figure declined significantly to a low of approximately 8 euros in September.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, regarding, similarly, then, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73913043478 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80829180028 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530434782609 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8666603138 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.111111111 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300599792277 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122819614452 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901291013305 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17537455404 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618797517981 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.