The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities, by youngest and oldest populations, in the US, in 2015.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of time that the youngest and oldest people spent on leisure and sports activities in a day, on average, in the US, in 2015.
Overall, it is clear that watching TV is the most favorite activity among young and old individuals. Playing games or using a computer is quite popular for teenagers while reading is another habit that seniors want to spend their time on.
Both generations love watching television since the average number of hours per day recorded was the highest among the remainings, at 4,5 hours for youngsters and 2,4 hours for older citizens. In contrast, students spent an average of one hour playing computer games when they had leisure time. However, this rate was only 0,5 when it came to the over 75 age group. Older individuals use a bit of their time reading, at one hour a day whereas young people put only 2 minutes of their entire day on this activity.
The trend was totally different when it came to other sectors. Aged people were likely to spend 6 minutes relaxing and thinking compared to just 1 minute for the young. In terms of socialization and sporting competitions, the children’s figure was more significant than that in the elderly, by 1 minute and 4 minutes respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-10 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 87 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | tamle | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | dinhthu05 | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-11 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university What are the advantages or disadvantages for their study 67
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes car and other items Why is this trend Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in 4 countries in 1970 and 2000 73
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65102354621 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.487158458 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249333335421 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919398077723 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134809058584 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170662806694 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178283152866 0.0819641961636 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.