The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2003 (4 age groups)
The line graph compared four different age groups who went to the movie theater once or more per month from 1984 to 2003.
Overall, it is clear that the 7-14 and 15-24 groups fluctuated and then decreased over the given period. The opposite trend was seen in the other two age groups, which also fluctuated but increased at the end of the shown period.
In 1984, the 15-24 sector was at the highest point of all, at about 16% of people who sometimes visit the cinema each month. The 7-14 group was at 10% while the age group of 25 to 35 was approximately 5%. Lastly, the lowest proportion of movie goers was the 35 and above group, which stood at around 2%.
The youngest and second-youngest groups had a dramatic fluctuation throughout the years. However, these two groups all dropped down to about 5% and 30% respectively at the end of the time frame. Similarly, the 25-35 sector fluctuated significantly from 1996 to 2000 but then rose back to 30% in 2003. The oldest group was more likely to go to the movie theater since the percentage of people went there once a month or more had an increase of 8% before peaking at around 12% in the last year.
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- It is said that people who read books for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than people who watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university What are the advantages or disadvantages for their study 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, second, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48341232227 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42041399337 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563981042654 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3204706647 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278101741091 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10541627458 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996718143516 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183839904379 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110786632994 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, second, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48341232227 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42041399337 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563981042654 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3204706647 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278101741091 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10541627458 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996718143516 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183839904379 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110786632994 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.