the chart below shows the change in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 2019 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons

The two graphs above illustrate the changes in electrical appliances ownership and also the amount of time spent in an hour doing housework per week per household. The data of this certain country was collected and visualised for the time period between 1920 and 2019. In general, there is an upward trend translated from the increase in all appliances ownership, whereby simultaneously there is a downward trend as a consequence of a decrease in hours for doing house chores per household a week.

The first visual shows a dramatic increase in appliance ownership across all three measured appliances. There was a sharp increase of up to 100 percent for refrigerator ownership. At the same time, while ownership for vacuum cleaner increased substantially from 30 percent to 100 percent, washing machine ownership increased with a slight fluctuation from 40 percent to 75 percent.

The second graph illustrates a gradual decrease from 50 hours to 10 hours of house chores per week per household between a 100-year period from 1920 to 2019. There is no fluctuation and the downward trend is definite.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...ve illustrate the changes in electrical appliances ownership and also the amount of time s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...end translated from the increase in all appliances ownership, whereby simultaneously there...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15555555556 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91566649518 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.592291878 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206632186199 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958872174194 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785217938941 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138487026026 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899361504728 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.