The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.
Given is a line graph providing data on the alternations of crime rates in three different areas, namely, burglary, car theft, and robbery in the city center of Newport over nine years.
A brief analysis of the graph reveals that while burglary rates saw a considerable reduction, the changes in robbery was relatively stable.
Increasing moderately from just under 3500 incidents in 2003 to approximately 3700 in 2004, burglary rates then exponentially plunged to almost 1100 reports in 2008. Another gradual growth followed this to slightly less than 1500 in 2009 and nearly leveled out in that number until 2012.
The patterns for car theft and robbery were completely different. The former witnessed an almost consistent trend between 2003 to 2005 (at 2800) where there was a minimal increase from around 600 to 900 for the latter in that period. However, a significant drop went on both of them, falling to 2100 and 500 events in 2008, respectively. Although the number of thefts fluctuated between 500 and 600 from 2008 to 2012, car theft rose to about 2600 reports by 2010 before reaching the same amount of 2003 in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | tieulinh4120 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | bibikulsum | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | bibikulsum | 78 | view |
- Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today. What are the causes of this problem, and how could the situation be improved? 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many doctors are concerned about the high use of computer games by children and young people. What mental and physical problems may arise from excessive use of these games? How could these problems be reduced? 89
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. 78
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96875 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60039309929 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671875 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4897138506 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142440379367 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507116830453 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454824754697 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797192963208 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432191423724 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.