The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Given is a line graph providing information about how much different kinds of meat and fish were consumed in a specific European country over a period of 25 years. Measures are shown in grams for each person.
A brief analysis of the figure reveals that while beef and lamb consumption decreased within the given period, members of that country started to consume more chicken in comparison to the first years of period. It is also interesting to note that fish consumption remained relatively unchanged throughout the period.
In 1979, beef was the preferable type of meat by people, accounting nearly 220 grams weekly. The second favorite category went on lamb, consuming almost 150 grams for each person. The figure for both of the mentioned meats declined significantly to approximately 180 and 120 grams respectively until 1984. Although lamb consumption experienced a period of stability for the next five years, beef consumption saw a negligible rise. Ultimately, this was followed by a dramatic reduction for both, falling to around 170 and 80 grams for beef and lamb consumption orderly.
By stark contrast, increasing from slightly under 100 grams in 1979 to somewhere in the vicinity of 190 grams in 1999, chicken consumption then jumped to 250 grams in the final year. Nonetheless, among these, the least favorite sort of food was fish, dipping marginally from 60 grams in 1979 to about 50 grams before 1984. Finally, it reached a plateau until 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 73
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects 84
- The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. 84
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, then, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09128630705 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77151090659 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609958506224 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8711457702 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19774466216 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710582112208 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677800603135 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12721833572 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633167851637 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.