The line graph illustrates the rates of burglary, car theft and robbery in Panama City during the year 2010 to 2019. Overall, the number of incidents in car theft and robbery remained the same over the years, when compared to burglary, which shows a considerable decline.
Burglary was the highest number of crimes in Panama City in 2010, with just below 3500. The rate of crime increased to near 4000 after a year. Whereas, the following years the graph has dramatic decrease to mere 1000 cases in 2015. The rate of burglary was just below 1500 when the graph ended in 2019.
In 2010 car theft stands for the second position of crime in Panama with the rate of over 2500 for two years. Then the graph has gradual drop to 2000 and remained the same for upcoming year's up to 2019 with below 3000 numbers. However, the robbery was almost similar over nine years with minimum of 1000 reported crimes in the City.
- Some people believe that the Olympics Games do not have a role in the 21st Century Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 96
- It is believed that culture and tradition are lost when it is exposed for earning money. However, others believe it important part of promotion. Discuss and give your opinion. 78
- Frequency of Eating at Fast Food Restaurants in the USA The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 56
- Capital punishment or death penalty is a debatable practice In many countries it is valid while others consider it inhuman and are against it What are your views 56
- In schools and universities girls tend to choose arts while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me increased to near 4000 after a year. Whereas, the following years the graph has dram...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58536585366 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09642623873 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6141849396 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143845405542 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684633715531 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488756552698 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103065331199 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147325905067 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.