The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities
and regional centres of Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make a comparison where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the allotment of distinct revenue groups in urban and rural centres of Australia.
Overall, the percentage of population in middle wage group is by far the highest while the figures in low income group is the lowest. Besides, the measurements indicate that lower middle and middle revenue groups occupy most of the entire individuals in these 2 difference areas.
In cities, the percentage of Middle salary group is the highest, at 35%, while the proportion of people have higher income is significantly lower, at 20%. There is 30% of the total population in cities has lower middle income. Nevertheless, only approximately 13% of inhabitants in cities have low annual salary.
In regonal centres, people have lower middle earnings are the highest, account for nearly 34%, whereas the figures in middle group is significantly lower, at around 27%. Adjacently, account for about 22%, the ratio of people in low icome group is a bit lower compared to middle earnings group. Only 15% of population there have high annual wage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-12 | Duong12345 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | sturdy | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 68
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 56
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 40
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12138728324 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73459893601 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.493703175 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113077218965 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562120448909 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399134314258 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885477488536 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388202500388 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.