The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
Depicted by the chart is the information about how much money (pounds sterling) was spent by two different countries on five distinct items by 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that people living in France and the UK spent much more money on cars than other consumer goods. Additionally, UK had a much higher number of in almost all goods expenditure in comparison with France.
In term of the UK outlay, the figures for cars and books were the two highest, accounting for just over 450,000 and 400,000 severally. This was followed by cameras and computers which had a similar level at around 350,000. Meanwhile, least money was spent on perfume, merely at just under 150,000.
Turning to the France expenditure, 400,000 was spent on cars –the maximum recorded- which was followed by computers, at just below 350,000. In addition, the citizens spent 300,000 on books, while the remaining goods (parfume and cameras) had the lowest figure, noted at 200,000 and 150,000 consecutively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | kheth | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mattia95 | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three catagories, from 1995-2002 78
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 84
- In recent years, the number of visitors of art galleries are decreasing steadily.What are the reasons for this trend?What can be done to improve the number of visitors. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...d a much higher number of in almost all goods expenditure in comparison with France. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...milar level at around 350,000. Meanwhile, least money was spent on perfume, merely at j...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12962962963 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60578653324 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635802469136 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.332843133 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128974573841 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554586752417 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592764466891 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885308132392 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650963302411 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.