The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who eating fast food in restaurants in six distinct groups in the United States from 2003 and 2013.
In general, the people who went to restaurants to eat fast food in once a week and once or twice a week have heights frequency among all other groups, while those eating fast food in restaurants daily and never have minimum frequency in the United States between 2003 and 2013.
As can be seen, the percentage of those who ate fast food in restaurants in once a week increased about 3 percent 2006 and dropped about 6 percent in 2013. While in once or twice a month group by 2003 30 percent of people ate fast food at restaurants that decrease by 5 percent in 2006 and increase more than 35% in 2013. Those eating fast food several times a week in restaurants has a fluctuation between 16% and 20 percent during 2003 to 2013 and people use restaurants a few times a year totally has raised. Two remains groups no more significant because none of them did not more than 5 percent all these years.
As a result, people have liked to eating fast food in restaurant for once a week and once or twice a month.
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42990654206 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44091682387 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453271028037 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1437994641 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22877798492 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133337459705 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660114769509 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167739006184 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328368318165 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.