Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
There is an opinion that the best measure of tackling traffic issues and environmental problems is to increase the price of oil. Although this action could be a solution, there are more practical and useful steps that governments can take.
It can not be denied that raising the high cost of petrol could deal with not only environmental degradation but also traffic congestion. The main reason is that many car owners would hesitate to take advantage of their vehicles often due to heavy petrol price, which might make them feel burdensome financially. For this reason, traffic jams, especially in metropolitan cities can drop significantly. Also, as there will be much less CO2 emissions caused by a large number of automobiles, environmental contamination, particularly global warming will be reduced substantially.
However, there are a couple of more feasible policies which deter these social issues. First and the foremost, by imposing a green tax on the public, governments can develop better-managed public transportation systems such as repairing old-road, which makes it is difficult for car owners to go and from work readily. This practice is likely to lessen traffic problems efficiently. Besides, if authorities encourage the general public to take public transit more than take their cars consistently through various green campaigns the society enables to expect a better environment with a cleaner atmosphere because of the decreased amount of CO2 levels in the air. In these contexts, such unpleasant problems can be solved.
In conclusion, I, by and large, disagree with this statement that increasing cost of petrol is the best solution because there are more effective initiatives that governments can take such as levying hefty tax and campaigns, which allow people to be aware of the importance of our environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-23 | Abi Mufti | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Abi Mufti | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Abi Mufti | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | Brian Sahar | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | marykim7178 | 78 | view |
- The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restuarnts between 2003 and 2013. 78
- In some countries governments pay the money for students' university fees, while in other countries students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages? 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 78
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household, which lead to environmental problems. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ll be much less CO2 emissions caused by a large number of automobiles, environmental contaminatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
.... Besides, if authorities encourage the general public to take public transit more than take t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, in conclusion, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3724137931 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02188608018 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2172260574 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115539973582 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455425346606 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541179150251 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868716022486 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437431957849 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.