The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates how many times Americans ate fast food in three given years (2003, 2006, and 2013).
Overall, the majority of people consumed fast food either once a week or at least once a week from 2003 to 2013. On the other hand, people who never and every day went to fast food restaurant accounted for the least proportion.
In 2003, the number of people ate fast food once a week was a little over 30%, then the figure went up by 2% to 33% but in 2013 it drop significantly to around 27%. For people who ate fast food once or twice a month, the percentage was 30% in 2003 but the figure declined sharply to 25% in 2006. However, number of people who consumed fast food rose considerably to about 33%.
In the category of several times a week, the percentage of people ate fast was approximately 17% and then went up to 20%. In 2013, the figure dropped to 16%. There was an increase in number of people eating fasting food from 2003 to 2006 and the figure remained the same in 2013. Proportion of people who ate fast food every day or never kept under 5% for the given years.
- The should below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drops'?
Suggestion: drops
...ure went up by 2% to 33% but in 2013 it drop significantly to around 27%. For people...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33980582524 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24773532093 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480582524272 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2155242081 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370986818886 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175505896856 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596479204864 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265566926415 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281780213611 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.39 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.