The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart compares six categories of people who eat at fast food restaurants in USA between years 2003 and 2013.
According to the chart the rate of American people who prefer to eat once per a week is more than others. Just small part of them are in the categories of “every day” and “never”.
In 2003, rate of the people who had meals at fast food restaurants was about 4 percent, and this number had seen small change of around 1 percent till 2013, while rate of people who are in the category of “never” had around the same change. In 2003, percentage of Americans who prefers to eat snacks was about 17 percent, while the rate of “once a week” and “once or twice a week” was 30 percent. 2006 saw an increase in “once a week” and “several times a week”, while the rate of people who ate fast food decreased 5 percent.
In 2013, most Americans were in the category of “once or twice a month” with the rate of approximately 33 percent and number of American people in categories “several times a week” and “a few times a year” were around half of it (16% and 15% respectively).
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employerssee no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects of 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;every day' and 'never'. In 2003, rate of the people who had meal...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ear' were around half of it 16% and 15% respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83823529412 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12726273329 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480392156863 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7850838126 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150050494338 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114379550484 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132263617238 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153011623724 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155115249413 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.