The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The given line graphs illustrate average monthly spending of British parents to their children’s sport activities and children’s participation on three different sports between 2008 and 2014.
It is clear that each year the amount of money spent on children’s sport activities increased significantly. Number of children which involved in given sports also rose over the 6-year period.
In 2008, the total amount of spending of parents to children’s sport were around 20 pounds per month. By 2014, this expenditure had risen gradually that reached a peak of more than 30 pounds at the end of the period.
Looking at the participation numbers of children in 3 different sports, it seems that in 2008 the figures for participation in each sport were nearly in the least amount of all times, while the football was the most popular sport among British children with participation of 7.5 million and taking part on swimming and athletics were under the 2.5 million. In 2014, the participation in football remained nearly the same, however children joined to swimming and athletics increased nearly twice that reached around 4 and 5 million respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | pritam | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | skelly | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employerssee no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects of 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31720430108 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08744955906 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.6416637478 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.285714286 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387410675389 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191024039767 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099512296922 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254324555487 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889109055807 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.